Port St. Lucie |
Code of Ordinances |
Title III. ADMINISTRATION |
Chapter 32. DEPARTMENTS, BOARDS, AND COMMISSIONS |
Article IX. POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR QUASI-JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS |
Sec. 32.80(c). - Unauthorized Ex Parte Communications.
In all quasi-judicial hearings, all rulings must be based only upon the evidence presented at the hearing. In accordance with Florida Statute Section 286.0115(1), ex parte communications with City Council, Board or Committee members in quasi-judicial matters is permissible and the adherence to the following procedures shall remove the presumption of prejudice arising from ex parte communications with City Council, Board or Committee members:
1.
The substance of any ex parte communication with a City Council, Board or Committee member which relates to the quasi-judicial action pending before the said City Council, Board or Committee is not presumed prejudicial to the action if the subject of the communication and the identity of the person, group, or entity with whom the communication took place is disclosed and made a part of the Record before the final action on the matter.
2.
A City Council, Board or Committee member may read a written communication from any person. However, a written communication that relates to a quasi-judicial action pending before the City Council, Board or Committee shall not be presumed prejudicial to the action, and such written communication shall be made a part of the Record before final action on the matter.
3.
A City Council, Board or Committee member may conduct investigations and site visits and may receive expert opinions regarding quasi-judicial action pending before them. Such activities shall not be presumed prejudicial to the action if the existence of the investigation, site visit, or expert opinion is made a part of the Record before final action on the matter.
4.
Disclosure made pursuant to subparagraphs 1, 2, and 3 must be made before or during the public meeting at which a vote is taken on such matters, so that persons who have opinions contrary to those expressed in the ex parte communication are given a reasonable opportunity to refute or respond to the communication.
(Ord. No. 17-65, § 3, 9-25-17)